We use cookies on this website to give you a better user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more

Assessment on Necessary Innovations for Sustainable Use of Conventional and New-Type Geothermal Resources and their Benefits in East Asia

Assessment on Necessary Innovations for Sustainable Use of Conventional and  New-Type Geothermal Resources and  their Benefits in East Asia
24 October 2018
Kasumi Yasukawa, Venkatachalam Anbumozhi

Print Article:

Against a backdrop of rising demand for sustainable energy solutions, there is a growing convergence in the role new types of geothermal technologies such a Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) can play in addressing energy security, generating local employment, and mitigating climate change. This report critically examines technical, social, policy, legal, and fiscal barriers to geo-thermal power production, direct use, and GSHP, and the estimated benefits in China, Indonesia, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Viet Nam. The estimated benefits are multiple and vary across the countries. For example, with a target capacity factor of 70%, Indonesia is in a position save 232 billion barrels of oil, avoid 129 million tons of carbon emissions, and generate about 15,000 local jobs. There are potential net benefits on a similar scale in the Philippines, Japan, China, and the Republic of Korea. Amongst the five types of barriers, it was found that technical and policy barriers dominate the Indonesian geothermal sector, while fiscal barriers are prevalent in the Philippines. Social barriers remain a challenge in Japan regarding direct use and GSHP. Three main areas are recommended for immediate policy action. One, clarify precisely the role of each state entity in providing critical incentives and concessions at three different stages of geothermal power development. Second, the tariff setting and tax holidays for geothermal, direct use, and GSHP should be seen not as a one-time event, but as a process – based on a published methodology and stakeholder consultation. Third, the inability to develop new resources is often due to lack of information on the reserve capacity. More spending on research and development is recommended.

Full Report 





Project Members


Chapter 1. Introduction and Project Scheme

Chapter 2. Summary of the Research Results

Chapter 3. Country Reports:

Chapter 3. 1. China

Chapter 3. 2. Indonesia

Chapter 3. 3. Japan

Chapter 3. 4. Republic of Korea

Chapter 3. 5. Malaysia

Chapter 3. 6. Philippines

Chapter 3. 7. Thailand

Chapter 3. 8. Viet Nam

Chapter 4. Recommendations to Policymakers


Search ERIA.org

Latest Multimedia

Indonesia's ASEAN Chairmanship 2023 High-Level Policy Dialogue: ASEAN Digital Community 2045

ERIA Knowledge Lab Discusses Scaling Up Innovation and Digital Technology Ecosystem

Is ASEAN Ready for Electric Vehicles? | ASEAN Insights Podcast

Latest Articles

Energy, Energy Transition, Carbon-neutral
12 July 2024
Editor(s)/Author(s): Han Phoumin, Yamada Fumiko
ASEAN is committed to developing renewable energy sources as part of the energy transition to[...]
energy, smart city, corporate governance, carbon neutral, Carbon performance, Malaysia
11 July 2024
Editor(s)/Author(s): Siti Indati Mustapa, Noor Raida Abd Rahman, Amar Hisham Jaaffar, Nor Salwati Othman, Syarifah Mardhiah Syed Salim
This study explores the role of corporate governance in carbon-intensive and[...]