We use cookies on this website to give you a better user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more

Putting a Price on Carbon in ASEAN and East Asia: Are Consumers Willing to Pay?

Putting a Price on Carbon in ASEAN and East Asia: Are Consumers Willing to Pay?
Date:
4 June 2025
Authors:
Ayu Pratiwi Muyasyaroh, Venkatachalam Anbumozhi, Kaliappa Kalirajan, Veerapandian Karthick
Tags:
carbon pricing, carbon price, net zero economy, ASEAN and East Asia

Print Article:

Carbon pricing is a policy tool designed to account for the external costs of carbon emissions, such as damage to crops, healthcare costs, and property loss due to climate change. It attaches a price to these costs and allocates responsibility to the sources of emissions. This approach helps incentivise the reduction of carbon emissions and encourages the adoption of technologies aimed at achieving a net zero economy. Revenue generated from carbon pricing can be reinvested by companies to support sustainable practices, including employee benefits and health insurance. While a few countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Asia have implemented carbon pricing mechanisms, there is limited understanding of individual preferences regarding these mechanisms at the national and regional levels. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism of the European Union aims to standardise carbon prices for internationally traded products. However, there is a lack of knowledge about preferences for such policy instruments across key stakeholders and countries.

A survey has been conducted to elicit stakeholders’ preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for a carbon price in ASEAN and East Asia. The overall proportion of ‘yes’ answers to the WTP question was around 70%. Mean WTP corresponds to an additional price of US$10–US$15. The analysis of more than 500 consumer responses revealed that several modifiers impact the choice of higher and lower WTP additional costs for climate actions. Amongst the consumer groups, academia and household residents are more concerned about climate change and its harmful consequences but have less knowledge and lower appreciation of external pressures such as the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. This, coupled with the already high electricity price, could have resulted in the lower WTP by the private sector respondents. Three null hypotheses on the effects of WTP on carbon emission reductions, revenue recycling, and regional cooperation are tested. The low WTP underscores the urgency of measures to overcome market size and technical and financing constraints, and to address regulatory hurdles that raise transaction costs, to achieve industrial competitiveness

Search ERIA.org

Latest Multimedia

Indonesia's ASEAN Chairmanship 2023 High-Level Policy Dialogue: ASEAN Digital Community 2045

ERIA Knowledge Lab Discusses Scaling Up Innovation and Digital Technology Ecosystem

Is ASEAN Ready for Electric Vehicles? | ASEAN Insights Podcast

Related Articles

Carbon Capture, Indonesia, Thermal Power Plants
19 February 2025
Editor(s)/Author(s): Shigeru Kimura, Soichiro Kunihiro
Indonesia aims to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, even as it relies heavily on thermal power[...]
energy, hydrogen production, carbon emission reduction
19 February 2025
Editor(s)/Author(s): Alloysius Joko Purwanto, Ridwan Dewayanto Rusli, Hafis Pratama Rendra Graha, Sirichai Koonaphapdeelert, Reza Miftahul Ulum, Citra Endah Nur Setyawati, Nadiya Pranindita, Ryan Wiratama Bhaskara
Making use of hydrogen demand and supply forecasts reported by ERIA[...]