We use cookies on this website to give you a better user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more

Analysis of Global Value Chain Participation and the Labour Market in Thailand: A Micro-level Analysis

Analysis of Global Value Chain Participation and  the Labour Market in Thailand: A Micro-level Analysis
Date:
18 May 2020
Authors:
Upalat Korwatanasakul, Youngmin Baek, Adam Majoe
Tags:
global value chains, wage distribution, job inclusion, labour market, labour productivity, Thailand

Print Article:

This study assesses the links between global value chain (GVC) participation and the labour market to examine the relatively unexplored employment-related distribution effects of GVC integration. Based on the Mincer wage model, we examine the relationship between GVC participation and worker productivity and wages at the individual level. Our main estimation method is a simple ordinary least squares estimation using pooled cross-sectional data from the Thai Labour Force Survey for the period 1995–2011. We also separately examine the effects of forward and backward GVC participation on wages and wage distributions. Our results show that GVC participation induces higher monthly wages for individuals and increases productivity in the labour market through either the forward linkage or backward linkage. We even find that GVC participation can help mitigate inequality. Our findings show that GVC participation promotes inclusive job creation and provides more job opportunities for rural, female, and low-skilled workers. Policies to support leveraging the existing strong industries through upgrading, smoothing labour movements while improving agricultural productivity, and preparing to move towards a services economy can help prepare Thailand, and other developing countries in general, to upgrade to higher value chains. Although GVC participation may be a catalyst for higher wages, greater labour productivity, and more inclusive job creation, its employment effects are complicated. An unbalanced policy framework might contribute to uneven income distributions and exclusive job creation as participating in GVCs through different linkages can benefit different stakeholders in varying ways. Therefore, a policy framework that balances the benefits among stakeholders in terms of wage distributions and job inclusion is ideal.

Full Report

Analysis of Global Value Chain Participation and  the Labour Market in Thailand: A Micro-level Analysis

Search ERIA.org

Latest Multimedia

Indonesia's ASEAN Chairmanship 2023 High-Level Policy Dialogue: ASEAN Digital Community 2045

ERIA Knowledge Lab Discusses Scaling Up Innovation and Digital Technology Ecosystem

Is ASEAN Ready for Electric Vehicles? | ASEAN Insights Podcast

Related Articles

East Asia, global value chains, Labour and Migration, Regulation and Governance, Trade
14 February 2020
Editor(s)/Author(s): Deborah Winkler
Global value chains (GVCs) may have distributional consequences for the relative demand for skilled labour. This study relates GVC participation[...]
global value chains, Industrialisastion, Connectivity, Trade
30 July 2019
Editor(s)/Author(s): Anita Prakash
Industrialisation is important for Africa’s growth and sustainable development. Deepening the manufacturing sector and greater integration[...]